Recently, I had an interesting conversation with a plant manager on the subject of Theory of Constraints. He claimed to know the subject well. “I practise it almost every day,” he said. It is nothing but fancy jargon for what is essentially common sense,” he added with a wink. He knew he was talking to a TOC practitioner who had put in 15 years implementing the paradigm in different organizations. Don’t feel insulted, he seemed to say with the wink. To me, the comments were amusing; I had encountered the attitude before. “Can you please elaborate on how you practise it daily?” I asked. “Well I always identify the constraints, and remove them to improve the environment,” he replied in a patronizing tone.

The manager was using the word constraint as defined in the dictionary. The dictionary defines it as a limitation or a restriction or an obstacle. According to this, he was right. Almost every manager trying to meet targets, is dealing with obstacles that come his way. He overcomes a few, stumbles over the others. He is identifying constraints and removing them. Is this theory of constraints?

“You just defined what is NOT theory of constraints,” I replied with a wink. I now had his full attention. “We need to clearly define the terms constraint, limitation and obstacle, and understand the key differences in the definitions to comprehend the subject, I clarified.

A limitation, which can be removed immediately after identification, is just an obstacle. But a limitation, which cannot be removed for significant time duration, is a constraint. All obstacles can be and should be removed immediately, but a constraint cannot be removed in the immediate future. There will always be a limitation that cannot be easily removed – it could be either capacity of the resources or customer demand. (Without a constraint a company will make infinite returns.)

This means that the only way we can improve the system is by exploiting the constraint.

If there is a constraint, which cannot be expanded upon immediately,it is obvious that managers should be exploiting it fully! That is common sense! remarked the plant manager.

“Common sense does not mean that it is commonly held sense. Let us understand using an example. What happens to behavior of consumers when there is a perceived scarcity of commodity in the market, I asked.

“People start hoarding it,” the manager replied.

The scarcity further aggravates, which in turn can lead to more hoarding and more scarcity. Suppose it is going to take long to restore normalcy, what should be the first step to improve the situation, my questions continued.

The first step to improve the situation would be to set rules of rationing so that hoarding is reduced, and everyone gets quantities which are just enough for immediate consumption and not more, replied the manager.

We improve the situation to prevent the wastage of the scarce commodity. The biggest wastage happens when someone is hoarding it while many others are starving for it, I added.

This requires that everyone agrees to a common goal – the entire population partakes of the commodity, and nearly no one faces a stock out, added the manager.

Before we identify a constraint, there needs to be an agreement on the goal of the system. Once the goal is known and the constraint is identified, everyone who is part of the system should be willing to subordinate everything else to the decision, which prevents wastage and allows effective utilization.Unless everyone decides to subordinate, there is no way, one can exploit the full potential of the constraint.

“If there is a constraint, then there is a very high chance that people would be wasting it. So the first step is to find out ways to exploit it before looking for ways to expand,” remarked the manager.

“Exploitation should be the first prudent step not just to delay the expansion. Many times, the exploitation steps might reveal so much hidden potential that expansion may not be required at all!” I added.

Practising Theory of Constraints requires one to internalize the following four steps.

Agree on system goalIdentify the constraint (which cannot be expanded immediately like customer demand or plant capacity)Decide on how one will exploit the constraintSubordinate everything else to the above decisions

Now with this learning, let us find out if we are actually taking subordinating steps daily to exploit the constraint. If production is the constraint, let us see if we are producing items which are not required while ignoring the ones which are immediately required. If the answer is yes, we are wasting the capacity not exploiting it.

If customer demand is the constraint, let’s examine if we are satisfying the current customers by giving him what he wants at the right time and right place. Are we reaching out to all potential customers, who are willing to buy our product? If not, then we are not exploiting the constraint.

“As I see it, amongst the four steps of TOC, the real “action” step is the step of subordination. How well the entire organization has decided to subordinate determines how well one is practising theory of constraints,” remarked the plant manager with a wink. This time it was a signal to acknowledge the harmony between us!

**Decision theory**

Decision theory provides a formal framework for making logical choices in the face of uncertainty. Given a set of alternatives, a …

In this new edition the author has added substantial material on Bayesian analysis, including lengthy new sections on such importa…

Making Better Decisions introduces readers to some of the principal aspects of decision theory, and examines how these might lead …

For courses in Decision Making and Engineering. The Fundamentals of Analyzing and Making Decisions Foundations of Decisi…

“The best book available for non-mathematicians.” — Contemporary Psychology.This book represents the earliest clear, detailed, p…

*Decision theory*

* I hope you found this video useful, please subscribe for daily videos!

WBM

Foundations: Mathematical logic Set theory

Algebra: Number theory Group theory Lie groups Commutative rings Associative ring theory Nonassociative ring theory Field theory General algebraic systems Algebraic geometry Linear algebra Category theory K-theory Combinatorics and Discrete Mathematics Ordered sets

Geometry Geometry Convex and discrete geometry Differential geometry General topology Algebraic topology Manifolds

Analysis Calculus and Real Analysis: Real functions Measure theory and integration Special functions Finite differences and functional equations Sequences and series Complex analysis Complex variables Potential theory Multiple complex variables Differential and integral equations Ordinary differential equations Partial differential equations Dynamical systems Integral equations Calculus of variations and optimization Global analysis, analysis on manifolds Functional analysis Functional analysis Fourier analysis Abstract harmonic analysis Integral transforms Operator theory Numerical analysis and optimization Numerical analysis Approximations and expansions Operations research

Probability and statistics Probability theory Statistics

Computer Science Computer science Information and communication

Applied mathematics Mechanics of particles and systems Mechanics of solids Fluid mechanics Optics, electromagnetic theory Classical thermodynamics, heat transfer Quantum Theory Statistical mechanics, structure of matter Relativity and gravitational theory Astronomy and astrophysics Geophysics applications Systems theory Other sciences

Category

Decision Theory #1- Introduction- Non-Probabilistic

__Decision theory__

## Recent Comments